The German-led NATO battalion in Lithuania, a "NATO buffer state", would have the determination to act, Lithuania's Chief of Defence Valdemaras Rupšys told BNS in an interview.
"I think there would be enough determination and will to use [the battalion]. This is guaranteed by their military commanders and not even called into question," he said.
According to Rupšys, the geographical proximity to Russia poses additional challenges, including cybersecurity, to the troops, but counterintelligence agencies in Lithuania and its allies have been actively working to ward off possible provocations.
Read more: Russia forms new division, deploys more ships and aircraft in Kaliningrad – report
According to the general, Germany's investment in Lithuania's military infrastructure shows that they are committed to staying in the country for a long time.
The talks on NATO's updated defence plan for the Baltic states and Poland are still ongoing within the Alliance as some political issues remain to be solved, he told BNS.
How has the deployment of NATO's battalion changed the security situation in Lithuania?
Strategically, NATO has demonstrated unity and showed it has the means and the will to take concrete steps to deter a potential adversary.
From the operational-tactical point of view, the deployment of enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) to the Baltic states is also of great value. It provides serious combat power that complements Lithuania's capabilities, and a potential adversary has to take this into account.
How have the capabilities changed over the three years and what are the expectations for the future?
Germany took on its role as the [head nation] of our battalion with enthusiasm, although the infrastructure and training base were not fully prepared to receive the troops.
The living and training conditions and interaction with our military units have greatly improved. For us, this is a unique opportunity to learn how to command and work with a mechanised heavy unit.
Lithuania’s top officials have asked NATO allies to deploy air defences to protect the multinational battalion. How is the battalion's equipment changing and what is being sought for the future?
This is a mechanised battle group. This means it has armoured combat vehicles, tanks, indirect fire weapons, that is, howitzers, and engineering and tactical reconnaissance equipment. If necessary, they can deploy engineering, and mine laying and clearance equipment to Lithuania at any time. Moreover, the German land force command sends in additional capabilities at our request if Lithuanian military units need it during exercises.
Read more: Lithuania’s new defence chief on modernization, independent battalions, conscription and Syria – key takeaways
Air defence plans and vision are a broader issue in the NATO context. We do raise this issue. A unit of this level is provided with short-range air defence support, and we are purchasing the NASAMS system to ensure medium-range air-defence. Higher-level air defence is a separate issue. But if there is a need for the battalion’s combat training, exercises and plans, airborne support is provided, too.
Read more: Lithuanian Air Force tests new air-defence system manufactured in Norway
Questions are sometimes raised about Germany's strict rules of engagement (ROE). What would you say to those in doubt? Could German soldiers fire in a crisis or conflict?
Yes, the national level has some influence on ROE. The framework [lead] nations of the battalions in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland have slightly different ROEs.
However, what is most important is that the strategic goal has been achieved: NATO has demonstrated both to our societies and to the potential aggressor that it is operational and capable.
Read more: NATO eroding Russia's military trump card in Baltics
As to the tactical-operational level, if there was a need to use the capabilities in combat action, they would certainly be used for their intended purpose. I believe our eFP would have the determination and will to use it. This is guaranteed by their military commanders and not even called into question.
In low-intensity operations, ROE details can be closely followed and compliance can be checked. The purpose of our eFP is deterrence and, if necessary, defence. If Lithuania, as a NATO member state, were to be defended, that would not be a low-intensity operation. All units would operate under the commander's intent and decisions. They have weaponry, personnel, equipment, and enough ammunition for the battlegroup to fight.
Read more: Lithuanian-led EU cyber response force enters rotation
Do Russian services stage provocations against the battalion’s troops?
Cases of information attacks have been recorded. We do not specifically say that Russia was behind them, but assumptions can be made
Our counterintelligence agencies and those of the states contributing to the battalion are actively working. We are watching and are ready to prevent any such actions.
Compared with other places of deployment, are the battalion's troops subject to stricter requirements on the use of communications equipment and communication with people around them because of the proximity to Russia?
Yes, they are. The units are given instructions on how to behave. They are in a foreign country and, at the same time, a NATO buffer state. Each state has its own instructions on how to behave. Initially, there were very strict rules, such as those the Dutch had, on using mobile phones and leaving the base. These rules are somewhat milder now; the troops have adapted to our conditions.
Read more: German troops taught to resist cyber attacks in Lithuania
On weekends and holidays, soldiers can leave the base, visit attractions in organised groups and individually, or spend their leisure time in cafes, cinemas and sporting events. In my opinion, they have no particular challenges when it comes to spending their free time. Of course, each place has its specificities, and the troops initially had to adapt to life in Jonava and the cultural differences. We do remember that there were problems after the deployment of the first air policing mission in Šiauliai, too.
Everyone has adapted now. Experiences have been exchanged formally and informally. I see no major problems.
How long will the battalion stay in Lithuania? Will it change?
It may increase or decrease in size, depending on military training tasks. Should the security situation change, nations have the flexibility to send units, and we as the host nation are flexible in providing the conditions.
In the short term, there should be no significant increase. As to downsizing, definitely not, because our combat training schedules are intense.
How long they will be deployed here will depend on NATO’s political decision. Germany declares that they will stay here as long as necessary. To be blunt, it makes sense for them to be here, because training in Lithuania creates huge added-value.
Read more: Poland and Lithuania to plan joint Suwalki Gap defence
Also, we can see that, to our knowledge, the German Defence Ministry spent over 62 million euros on the development of the battalion battle group infrastructure Lithuania in 2017–2018. The money was used to develop accommodation facilities for servicemen, premises for staff work, a temporary logistics support area, warehouses and well-being facilities for servicemen in Rukla, and to build a camp for 500 troops in Pabradė.
We have been informed that in the next couple of years, Germany will continue to allocate millions [of euros] for investments in Lithuania to improve and develop the military infrastructure. It is discussed that the funds could go toward large infrastructure facilities, such as warehouses, barracks, or a permanent logistical support area, or something like that.
What is the current situation regarding the updating of the defence plan for the Baltic countries and Poland? There have been reports that the plans returned to the Military Committee for review after they were approved by the NATO summit in London.
A number of task groups have been working on updating defence plans not only for the Baltic countries, but also on updating all NATO defence plans. The process of coordination with all member countries is ongoing, because these plans are interconnected, especially in terms of capabilities that NATO member states can generate.
Work is underway. The latter NATO committee assured [us] that decisions should be made soon. Despite the decision of the London summit, when it was said that issues had been agreed on, some polishing up by politicians is still needed.
Read more: Baltics, Poland convince Turkey not to block defence plan, Lithuanian president confirms
The NATO enhanced Forward Presence Battalion Battle Group was deployed to Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland in February 2017 in response to Russia's aggression in Ukraine and its activity in the region.