News2019.10.10 09:00

How to get the European Parliament to read Russia Today 2019.10.10 09:00

EP Today, a news website that doesn’t write 99 percent of its articles, targets decision makers in the EU and misleads the public about the origin of most of their content: Russia Today.

'EP Today' (short for 'European Parliament today') is a self-proclaimed “monthly news magazine for the European Parliament”, EU’s campaign to tackle Russian disinformation,, reports. The 145,000 Facebook fans and an average output of 25 articles per day complete the narrative that it is an established, influential and informed part of EU

Except: 'EP Today' uses the name of the European Parliament in a misleading way and without any legal authorisation.

The European Parliament contacted 'EP Today' in September of this year regarding the unauthorised use of the institution’s name and suggested ways to rectify the situation and stop misleading the public.

On their about page, 'EP Today' states it is “designed only for the MEPs to write article about issues which they think are currently important and need attention of all their colleagues and other policy makers.” [sic]

However, more than 99% of articles that appear on are not from 'EP Today'.

Since October 24th 2018, 47% of the articles are word-for-word copies of articles from Often, the entire homepage is filled with exact copies of RT articles. analysed all available 17,697 articles published by under their “news” section. A dataset spanning over 2 years, from April 6, 2017 to August 23, 2019, included only 25 contributions from MEPs or other decision makers, a mere 0.14 percent.

Articles published by day also show a high level of automation – 30 or 50 articles max per day.

The website seems to be a lobbying platform, presented as a serious news outlet, whose target audience is the EU decision makers. The concept is simple: 'EP Today' offers exposure in return for attention.

To make that offer, a website needs to appear like a serious news outlet providing relevant content on a regular basis that attracts many viewers. Given that “EP Today operates out of Brussels with its core staff,” with only a mailbox address in Brussels, none of their editors on LinkedIn or Twitter and their four Facebook page admins situated in India, it is difficult to provide enough relevant content to appear like an attractive outlet for contributions by decision makers.

The answer to appearing bigger, active and not like a one-issue lobby group is: content syndication.

Before October 24, 2018, 'EP Today' exclusively syndicated “Voice of America” (VOA). Up to 50 articles per day were automatically embedded, which resulted in more than 99% of 'EP Today' content coming from VOA. Why the switch from one syndicated outlet to another in 2018?

One reason could be that, global rank 299 on Alexa, has a higher readership internationally than, which Alexa currently ranks on global position 2831. But there are many other news outlets ranking much higher and are more relevant to the EU audience that 'EP Today' targets.

Both, “Voice of America” and “Russia Today”, have very permissive terms of use, explicitly allowing the reuse of their content on other websites. While for example, with a global rank of 81, requires a case-by-case permission to embed their content, “Voice of America” content is in the public domain, allowing reuse – however, with exceptions to content not produced by them. even goes as far as to “encourage free re-use of its materials for non-commercial purposes,” under the condition to link to the original page. VOA only requires subscribing sites to credit them.

'EP Today' owns at least one Twitter profile with almost 6,000 followers and a Facebook page with 145,000 followers.

Below is the exact moment before and after the switch from VOA to RT on 'EP Today' Twitter profile. Without announcement or transparency, the Twitter account suddenly promotes RT messages. Ironically, during the INF treaty debate.

The last syndicated VOA article on @eptoday displays the two sides of the debate, while the first article by RT condemns the United States as seeking world domination.

To the 6,000 followers, this shift was invisible, as Twitter does not show the original source of the article, but only the host website:

We have seen related “information laundering” of RT content in the US, Germany or Belarus. The result – and sometimes objective – is always to mislead readers.

LRT has been certified according to the Journalism Trust Initiative Programme

Newest, Most read